A fair entrance on the AFL tribunal witness rack has backfired on Brisbane defender Harris Andrews, whose evidence was, eventually, employed from him during a bid to own his suspension .
The Lions will be without their Vice Captain For their critical struggle against Hawthorn this weekend following the MRO’s one-week ban handed to Andrews for spectacular Kangaroo Nick Larkey was maintained on Tuesday evening time.
Brisbane contested the banning two counts: The touch was not high and the force used didn’t warrant a suspension.
Toyota AFL Grand Final 2019 Live Stream and Premiership Season. Every match of every round. Live & anytime on your TV or favourite device.
The Lions argued Andrews utilized his forearm as a bumper to Secure his Space and also the initial contact was made with Larkey’s arm, leading to the Lion’s arm making contact with the Roo’s throat/chin region. However, that signs was ignored from the tribunal, using all the chairman Ross Howie claiming:”A strike is a strike and at which it lands is where it lands”
However, As it came the time and energy for you to argue the contact was irrelevant, Andrews became their or her own worst enemy when he admitted he discovered Larkey’s teeth clatter when he left contact.
This proof was subsequently applied against Andrews to show the drive was, in reality, significantly more than slight.
Thus, Andrews’ one-game ban has been maintained — his first first suspension of his 91-game career.
Andrews, ” the team’s No. 1 spoiler and a sturdy All-Australian chance, said he was”quite unhappy” with the verdict.
“I’ve not experienced a terrible record over my time playing certainly not about that at the game,” Andrews told reporters post-hearing.
“I believed that I didn’t attack Nick Larkey.”
However, herald-sun reporter Jon Ralph stated Andrews’ evidence functioned .
“Harris Andrews can be an absolute superstar of the fullback and a defender — a Rhodes scholar he is maybe not,” Ralph informed Fox Sports News’ AFL to-night .
“That Was a complete disaster what he did within the rack. There are some persons you definitely only don’t put about the testimony standalone.
“It had been nearly Grassy Knoll stuff: Here is the Grassy Knoll, listed here is the bullet cases, here’s the gun, here’s what I did.
“As soon as he stated (teeth clatter), you realized that the AFL was going to jump that”
Andrews’ evidence aside, Ralph said that the correct choice was made to uphold the ban.
“We’ve seen such episodes, in any stage, have seen some people exonerated,” he explained.
“You also should not be able to squat a participant inside the throat, especially when you make contact such as this.
“Today It absolutely wasn’t potentially an malicious action, but it was definitely one at that he struck a person. I think too the AFL tribunal has accepted the e motion plus they’ve let off players.
“All of us know he’s mostly a Ballplayer, a fantastic player, but when you elbow somebody else from the Throat and it’s the capacity to bring about significant harm, and it really is what you Needs to be frozen for.”